online solution: Describe the data in the Matrix Table.1. Compare and contra

Describe the data in the Matrix Table.1. Compare and contrast variables within each study. 2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.? 3. Participant demographics and information. 4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity. 5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question? 6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work. The two articles I used are below: Article ReferencesPurposeHypothesisStudy Question(s)VariablesIndependent(I)Dependent(D)Study DesignSampleSize & SelectionData CollectionMethods Major Finding(s)1 Li, Y., Cen, X., Cai, X., & Temkin-Greener, H. (2019). Perceived Patient Safety Culture in Nursing Homes Associated With “Nursing Home Compare” Performance Indicators. Medical Care, 57(8), 641-647. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001142 This report aims to determine whether the staffing ratio positively or negatively impacts patient safety.D- overall safety culture scoreI- A higher value indicates a safer nursing home culture.QuantitativeN- 2254 Medicare/Medicaid certified free-standing nursing homes nationwide. SurveyEfforts to improve nursing home patient safety may improve overall patient safety and quality of care.2 Harrington, C., & Edelman, T. S. (2018). Failure to Meet Nurse Staffing Standards: A Litigation Case Study of a Large US Nursing Home Chain. Inquiry: a journal of medical care organization, provision, and financing, 55, 46958018788686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958018788686(1) How did the residents’ care needs compare to the nurse staffing levels in place at the time?(2) How did staffing levels compare to federal and state requirements for nurse and professional staffing standards?(3) Did the facilities adhere to state and federal requirements regarding resident rights and care quality?D- Low staffing ratioI-negative patient outcomes Mixed-design qualitative and quantitative  N- 12 nursing homes in Arkansas. a sizeable for-profit nursing home chain’s Interviews, documents, and records.(Plaintiffs’ lawyers took 150 depositions in 8 states analyzed thousands of documents from residents’ medical records, including 180 000 emails, 7.5 million time card entries, and 51 million electronic activity of daily living entries. A closer look revealed that the facilities did not provide adequate care for residents, did not adjust staffing for resident acuity, and did not meet the necessary nurse staffing levels shown in research and recommended by experts. Residents suffered from poor care, injuries, and deaths, as well as violations of their human dignity.   Health Science Science NursingNR 449