solution:   2400 WORDS. 8 PAGES. DUE TOMORROW Check the final assignment file  Note: The Assignment must be

 

2400 WORDS. 8 PAGES. DUE TOMORROW

Check the final assignment file 

Note: The Assignment must be submitted online using the Final Assignment Dropbox.

The assignment will be returned to you via this dropbox.

Final Assignment – 25%

Description

You are the sustainability consultant of a firm or organization of your choice. Analyze

their report and compare it with a report of a competitor. Comment on their differences

and provide proposals for further developing your firm’s or organizations sustainability

reporting based on the background and tools that have been discussed in class.

Write a report for both sustainability reports using the following structure:

1. Cover page with name of student and student id, and sources of the reports
including the names of the firms/organizations

2. Connection to general sustainability issues and reporting of impacts for both
reports

3. Description of the accounting methods and tools applied by both reports

4. Assessment of the reliability, validity of the presented data and activities of both
reports

5. Assessment of the materiality of the reported data and activities for both the
company and stakeholders

6. Assessment of the general quality of the two reports

7. Description of the main differences between the two reports

8. Proposals for further improvements for the reporting of ‘your’ firm or organization.

DUE DATE:

April 5, 2022, 11:59 pm.

LENGTH:

8 – 12 pages, double spaced, 12 pt. size, cover page excluded

EXPECTATIONS:

o Meet the stated requirements of the assignment.

o The assignment is well written and well structured.

o The arguments are convincing and supported by reliable references including
those on the readings list.

HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

Your assignment must be submitted online to the Final Assignment Dropbox. The

assignment will be returned to you via this dropbox. Dropboxes can be accessed by

clicking Assessments and then Dropbox on the course navigation bar above.

Your assignment must be submitted in one of the following file types:

o Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx)

o Rich Text Format (.rtf)

o Do not submit in pdf format

Please refer to the Submitting to a LEARN Dropbox page for general guidelines and

how to submit to a dropbox.

MARKING RUBRIC:

Excellent Very good Good

Cover page with name of student and student id,
and sources of the reports including the names of
the firms/organizations

1

Connection to general sustainability issues and

reporting of impacts for both reports

3 2 1

Description of the accounting methods and tools

applied by both reports

3 2 1

Assessment of the reliability, validity of the

presented data and activities of both reports

3 2 1

Assessment of the materiality of the reported data
and activities for both the company and
stakeholders

6 3 1

Assessment of the general quality of the two
reports

6 3 1

Description of the main differences between the
two reports

3 2 1

Proposals for further improvements for the
reporting of your firm or organization

3 2 1

Assignment well written and structured 2 1

30 points = 100%

Introduction to Corporate Sustainability

ENBUS 407

January 13th, 2022

What is corporate sustainability?

1

How to read your First CSR Report?

PRESENTATION TITLE

2

Content of the report

1.1 Mentions the SDGs? Only goals or specific targets?

1.2 Frameworks used: CDP, GRI, SASB, mentions their risk scenarios for TCFD

1.3 A greenwashing report or measurable KPIs? For example, we will reduce our CO2 emissions by 10% based on X emissions and the base year is 2018!

1.4 External Sustainability Assurance/Audit provided?

2) Governance

2.1 Who develops the sustainability agenda?

2.2 Can you evaluate the power dynamics between stakeholders? In essence, who has the upper hand (the company’s shareholders or balanced with other stakeholders)?

2.3 How many rounds of sustainability? ONE annual meeting or a quarterly review?

3) Sustainability Measures

Economic, Social, and Environmental! Are they integrated?

3

If the report mentions TCFD, then……

Global Reporting Standards

PRESENTATION TITLE

PAGE 5

Governance: who manages the sustainability agenda?

Power dynamics between Stakeholders

5

Materiality MAP – Nestle

Are we including all stakeholder?

Do they have equal votes?

6

Select a corporate environmental or sustainability report of a firm you choose and present the results of your analyses in a 10 minutes presentation using the following structure

Name, industry and activities of the company

Basic financial data (linked to Sustainability Management)

Name(s), link(s), and format(s) of the report(s) (environmental, sustainability, integrated, pdf, website, etc.)

Content of the report(s)

Strengths and weaknesses of the company with respect to sustainability performance

Strengths and weaknesses of the report(s).

Present arguments

Why are general sustainability indicators useful for measuring corporate sustainability performance?

Why are general sustainability indicators not useful for measuring corporate sustainability performance?

Corporate sustainability reports address general sustainability indicators

Yes

No

Connecting sustainable development problems with firms’ performances

Firms as supporters or barriers for SD

Inside out relation

No:

Indicators are too general

Macro

Not material

9

What is corporate sustainability?

Check the internet

Business case

Outside-in

Shareholders and stakeholders

Risks and opportunities

Economic, environmental, social

However…..

10

General Sustainability: Consequences for Business

Companies should be aware of a broader set of perspectives about the importance and impact of business in society.

Two main perspectives

Inside-out: Sustainability case of business, addressing major sustainability concerns

Outside-in: Business case of sustainability

What are the two perspectives of sustainable development?

11

The Evolution of Corporate sustainability

Corporate Sustainability

Fuzzy Concept

Buzzword or life-changer?

From Eco-efficiency to Social Enterprise

Who defines the concept?

How can we assess and report corporate sustainability performance?

What is corporate sustainability? This about some keywords.

13

Sustainability can influence the share price

14

VW Emissions Scandal

…and long-term

Seven Tips for Businesses to achieve CS

Collaborate with multiple stakeholders

Two heads are better than one (pre-competition)

Business case is not only about money

Quick fixes may impede sustainable solutions

Build unique partnerships

Address the entire product chain

Explore hidden advantages in the supply chain

Bansal, T. (2014, September 9). Seven ways that lead to corporate sustainability, The Globe and Mail.

17

Corporate Sustainability in Practice: Broad Spectrum

“CS is fully integrated and embedded in every aspect of the organization, aimed at contributing to the quality and continuation of life of every being and entity, now and in the future. The motivation for CS is that sustainability is the only alternative since all beings and phenomena are mutually interdependent. Each person or organization therefore, has a universal responsibility towards all other beings”

(Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2-3), 107-119. doi: 10.1023/a:1023383229086)

18

Triple-Bottom-Line as a CS model

Corporations should not just focus on the economic value they add, but also on the environmental and social value they add – and destroy.

Measuring and reporting corporate performance against economic, social and environmental parameters.

Capture the whole set of values, issues and processes that companies must address in order to minimize any harm resulting from their activities and to create economic, social and environmental value.

Taking into consideration the needs of all stakeholders

(Elkington, 1987)

Minimize harm, but Who is the best performer?

19

Corporate Sustainability: TBL

social, environmental and economic performance

sustainable development, sustainable environment, sustainable communities

impact on society, the environment, and economic sustainability

economic, environmental and social sustainability

economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social justice

economic growth, ecological balance and social progress

economic growth, social progress and environmental health

economy, environment, equity

profit, people, planet (or planet, people, profit)

landscapes, lifestyles and livelihoods

Vanclay, F. (2004). The Triple Bottom Line and Impact Assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 6(3), 265-288.

What does TBLI mean?

20

…but

TBL is meant to be a way of thinking about corporate social responsibility, not a method of accounting.

(Elkington, 1997)

WBCSD* Definition of CS

Incorporating the costs of externalities, starting with carbon, ecosystem services and water

Doubling agricultural output without increasing the amount of land or water used

Halting deforestation and increasing yields from planted forests

Halving carbon emissions worldwide by 2050 through a shift to low-carbon energy systems

Improved demand-side energy efficiency, and providing universal access to low-carbon mobility

(*World Business Council for Sustainable Development)

Focus on sustainability case instead of business case. Change from TBLI

22

23

Corporate Eco-efficiency

‘doing more with less’

term often associated with (World) Business Council for Sustainable Development

‘win-win’

WBCSD founded 1992 at the Rio Summit

23

Eco-Efficiency Definition

Delivering competitively priced goods and services while progressively reducing ecological impacts (WBCSD)

How can ecological efficiency be communicated in a sustainability report?

Ratio of an output divided by an input

How can ecological efficiency be communicated in a sustainability report? Input comparted to output

24

Alternative Concepts of Corporate Sustainability

De-growth

Shared Value

Social entrepreneurship

25

De-Growth

Sustainable Development did not achieve its goals: efficiency is eaten up by growth

Goal: Decrease in material and energy consumption in countries that exceed their allowable ecological footprint

First de-growth and then steady-state economics

Historical background: France 1980s

26

Shared Value

Narrow view of business

Short-term financial performance without focusing on customer needs and ignoring broader influences on success.

Trade-off between economic efficiency and social progress

Creating economic value in a way that also creates value for society by addressing its needs and challenges.

(Porter & Kramer, 2011)

Clooney and Nespresso

27

Shared Value

Societal needs, not just conventional economic needs, define markets

Social harms or weaknesses frequently create internal costs for firms

Addressing societal issues may create innovation

Not a redistribution approach

(Porter & Kramer, 2011)

How to report? Is there still a divide between internal (management) and external (stakeholder) reporting

Change to integrated reporting

28

Accounting for and Reporting Shared Value

Social Return on Investment

Blended Return

Integrated Reporting

29

Example: Nespresso

At Nespresso, Nestlé worked to build clusters, which made its new procurement practices far more effective. It set out to build agricultural, technical, financial, and logistical firms and capabilities in each coffee region, to further support efficiency and high-quality local production.

Nestlé led efforts to increase access to essential agricultural inputs such as plant stock, fertilizers, and irrigation equipment; strengthen regional farmer co-ops by helping them finance shared wet-milling facilities for producing higher-quality beans; and support an extension program to advise all farmers on growing techniques.

It also worked in partnership with the Rainforest Alliance, a leading international NGO, to teach farmers more-sustainable practices that make production volumes more reliable. In the process, Nestlé’s productivity improved.

http://www.nestle-nespresso.com/ecolaboration/creating-shared-value

30

Strengths and Weaknesses of CSV

Strengths

Connecting business strategy and social goals

Systematizing of some previously underdeveloped, disconnected areas of research and practice

Weaknesses

Unoriginal

Ignores the tensions between economic and social goals

Naïve about business compliance

Based on a shallow conception of the corporation’s role in society.

Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the Value of “Creating Shared Value”. California Management Review, 56(2), 130-153. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130

Is it always possible to create shared value? Zero-sum games

Business compliance: Business are not even compliant (Sweatshop Bangladesh),

Shallow conception: model still centres on conventional way of corporation

31

Social Entrepreneurship

Social entrepreneurship is the process of pursuing innovative solutions to social problems.

Social entrepreneurs adopt a mission to create and sustain social value.

32

Goals

Entrepreneur

Serve markets that can afford the new product or service and create financial profit.

Social entrepreneur

Aims for value in the form of large-scale, transformational benefit that accrues either to a significant segment of society or to society at large.

33

Examples

Grameen Bank

Social Capital Partners

34

Conclusions

Corporate Sustainability is a very broad term

There are different concepts of corporate sustainability

New developments address de-growth instead of efficiency and focus on financial and social value at the same time

Newer concepts need new types of reporting

35

2005

Base Year

200620072008Goal

(2010)

VOC (lbs/$million sales)710590520540530TRI Releases (lbs/$million

sales) (US only, TRI

Releases based on year reported and sales based on year released)190170160140N/AEnergy (million

BTU/$million sales)

1,3301,1901,1201,0701,065Waste (includes offsite

recycling) (million

lbs/$million sales).031.030.027.025.02483P Projects1262*364 (in 2006

alone)

438 (in 2007

alone)

616 (in 2008

alone)

800**3P Savings$181,900,00

0*

$52,700,000 (in

2006 alone)

$91,400,000 (in

2007 alone)

$91,000,000 (in

2008 alone)

N/A3P Pollution Prevented

(tons)

516,000*35,000 (in 2006

alone)

56,600 (in 2007

alone)

61,000 (in 2008

alone)

N/A

The Emergence of Sustainability Accounting

January 20th, 2022

1

PG. 2

2

PG. 3

Solution 

Start Here

Imagine the plot is divided into 4 quadrants and each number has the consecutive number mirrored in the opposite quadrant

For example: start here: 1 , 2, 3, 4

3

Why is Sustainability a Business Issue?

Costs of environmental and social impacts

Waste, climate change, relocation of communities, etc.

Stakeholder Pressure

Opportunities of sustainable development

Renewable energy technology, infrastructure, education, healthcare, new markets

Globalization

Sustainability as a competitive factor

Why has the importance of sustainability accounting in business grown? External pressure, internal pressure

4

Accounting

Accountable: Having the duty to explain how resources have been used

Resources

Financial

Employees

Inputs

….?

5

Accountability

The obligation of an individual or an organization to account for its activities

To accept responsibility for the results and to disclose them in a transparent way.

Includes the responsibility for money and other entrusted resources

Agree on the definition of accountability.

6

Fields of Accounting

Financial Accounting.

Cost Accounting.

Managerial Accounting.

Auditing

PG. 8

Sustainability accounting has a long history in academia and industry practices.

Reporting started in the 1920 mainly through financial reporting to produce the financial statement of corporations such as the balance sheet and profit and loss

8

1920s

1960s

1970s

Financial Reporting

Social reporting

2000s

Environmental Reporting

Integrated Reporting

PG. 9

Social Reporting

Working conditions

Access to health care

Occupational Health and Environmental safety

Social reporting started in the 1960s, namely in France when labour unions started employers to report on the working conditions of employees.

9

1920s

1960s

1970s

Financial Reporting

Social reporting

2000s

Environmental Reporting

Integrated Reporting

PG. 10

Environmental Reporting

Carbon emissions

Pollution and waste

Energy

In the 1970s and 1980, corporations started to report on their environmental performance to gain competitive advantage and also to be good citizens

10

1920s

1960s

1970s

Financial Reporting

Social reporting

2000s

Environmental Reporting

Integrated Reporting

Sustainability Accounting Systems

Transparency about an organization’s activities

encouraged by external audits and verification

Stakeholder engagement

Voluntary and mandatory systems

Driven by

Regulators

NGOs

Market mechanisms

Internalization of external costs and benefits

11

Who is accountable?

Entities for which stakeholder interest exist

Traditional stakeholders

Shareholders

Lenders

Investors

Regulators

Financial accounting for a certain type of firms only

12

Who is Accountable and to whom?

Shareholders

Regulators,

Financiers

Society

Intermediaries (rating agencies)

13

Accountable to Stakeholders

Individuals or groups having an interest in a company because they

can affect or

can be affected

by a company’s activities

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Why is the government interested in banks’ sustainability reporting?

14

Stakeholder theory explains…

…why organizations have to consider multiple interests to be a good sustainability performer

…the need of new forms of stakeholder engagement in order to achieve better sustainability performance and sustainability accountability

…the development of sustainability accounting systems

The stakeholder concept is relatively new. Therefore, we need new ways of corporate communication, such as sustainability reporting

15

Types of Stakeholders

External

Shareholders, NGOs, regulators, suppliers, clients, investors, …

Internal

Employees, managers, …

What does this imply for accounting and reporting?

Conflicts (Agency Dilemma): Many managers will avoid taking any risks!

What are external stakeholders that could be interested in accounting? What are internal stakeholders? Discuss with neighbor.

Response: Different stakeholders have different needs. Reporting and accounting have to address these needs.

Primary and Secondary..

16

Implication: Stakeholder Accounting

Accounting for impacts on stakeholders

Different impacts on different stakeholders

Civil Society members Vs. employees Vs. investors

Less detailed communication

Tension between PR and transparent accounting

17

Example for stakeholder oriented reporting: The Equator Principles for Project Finance

Voluntary code of conduct for project financiers

Social and environmental risk management framework

Conventional view

18

A stakeholder view on project finance

Project financier

Project

Environment

Affected communities

the principles

Review and categorization

Environmental and social assessment

Applicable environmental and social standard.

Environmental and social management system and action plan

Stakeholder engagement

Grievance mechanism

Independent review

Covenants

Independent monitoring

Reporting and transparency

Check the website for EP Reporting

http://www.equator-principles.com

What do they report about?

Does the reporting address stakeholders?

Who are the stakeholders?

Project risks, regions, implementation of principles

21

Sustainability Accounting

Activities, methods and systems

Recording, analysis and reporting

Outside-in relation: Sustainability induced financial impacts

Inside-Out relation: Sustainability impacts of a defined economic system, such as a firm

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

22

SASB Definition of Sustainability Accounting

to evaluate the environmental, social and governance performance of companies

through an account of their management of various forms of non-financial capital associated with sustainability

environmental, human, social, governance

which they rely upon for sustained, long-term value creation.

Materiality

23

Accounting Systems and Stakeholders

Based on: Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, p. 33

Management

Management

accounting

Internal sustainability

accounting

Employees

COMPANY

Financial accounting

Other

accounting systems

External sustainability accounting

Other sustainability accounting

General Public

Media

Creditors

Insurance companies

Suppliers

Shareholders

Tax agency

Communities

NGOs

Regulators

First internal accounting, both management accounting and sustainability accounting

Then external accounting: Financial accounting, other accounting, i.e. governance, material sourcing

Then external sustainability accounting. Other sustainability accounting for regulators.

24

Effects of Sustainability Accounting in Addition to Higher Transparency

Better employee morale, attraction and retention

Improved corporate reputation

Anticipation of future regulations

Anticipation of markets connected with sustainability

Supporting sustainable management practices

25

Different Interests in Accounting

Why are managers interested in sustainability accounting and what are they interested in?

Why are stakeholders interested in sustainability accounting and what are they interested in?

26

Management and Internal Sustainability Accounting

Wider field than Financial accounting

Long-term

Detailed

Facilitates

managerial decision-making

Internal accountability

Basis for external accounting

Why is internal reporting not used for stakeholder communication?

27

Other Drivers for Sustainability Accounting: Costs and Benefits

Until the 1980s environmental and societal impact not a cost or benefit driver

From 1980s: Polluter pays principle

Fines (Exxon, BP)

Higher costs of impacts and lower costs for information systems: marginal cost curves

Reputation

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more