answered: See attached. 4 pages nothing less. Due in 24 hoursI recommend doing it on Tony Robbins Motivational

See attached. 4 pages nothing less. Due in 24 hours

I recommend doing it on Tony Robbins Motivational speech on this link 

This 3-4 page paper is a Neo-Aristotelian criticism of a rhetorical speech and will introduce you
to doing rhetorical criticism. Select an influential public speech intended to have an immediate
short-term effect on its audience (political, motivational, congressional, presidential, speeches
for a cause, etc.) and utilize the basic framework of rhetorical criticism shown below.

The paper should be divided into the following five sections:

[1] Introduction.

Briefly introduce the speech. Then clearly present and underline the thesis* of your criticism.

(*Remember, a rhetorical criticism should not be a mere application of a method to some
rhetorical artifact. Rather, the criticism should have some point, and that point will be expressed
in the thesis of the paper. Because the point of the criticism depends upon what you discover in
your analysis, it is often not possible to frame the thesis of the criticism until the analysis
(section [4] ) has been completed and at least a rough outline of the conclusions (section [5])
has been done.)

[2] Background

Next, describe the artifact by addressing a number of topics… First, summarize the factors that
gave rise to the speech, especially the exigence the speech seeks to redress. Second,
describe the rhetorical function(s) or intent of the speech, explicating the attitudes, beliefs, or
actions the artifact seeks to induce. Third, demonstrate the significance* of the speech by
explaining why it merits critical attention.

(*Significance can be established in three ways: 1] it has had a strong or widespread effect on
one or more audiences, 2] it is typical or representative of many other rhetorical speeches, 3] it
is unique and, therefore, may demonstrate some unusual rhetorical principle.)

[3] Summary of method.

In this section, present a brief introduction to the Neo-Aristotelian method. This can be one or
two paragraphs, and should fulfill two functions: [1] it should acquaint the reader with the
general nature of the method and [2] it should justify the suitability of this method for the
analysis.

[4] Analysis

Now, apply the method and present your findings. This will typically be the most developed
section of the paper. Organize the analysis according to the rhetorical canons being applied.*
In this section, you’re making an argument by filling up this section with supporting evidence
from the speech itself. If you make a strong, evidence-based case, the paper has “justification.”

(*Remember, you don’t necessarily have to apply all 5 canons indiscriminately. You may instead
choose to focus on the canon(s) or proof(s) that are most relevant/salient to your selected
speech.)

[5] Discussion.

“So what” about your analysis? Get insightful here! In this section, interpret the findings of the
analysis and suggest further implications. The answers to the below questions constitute what
are commonly called the conclusions of the criticism. The conclusions of your paper are the
payoff of the analysis and should be prepared and presented carefully. Some of these
conclusions will also guide the development of the thesis of the paper in that they establish the
point of your criticism. So the paper will have “coherence” because this section unpacks the
thesis that was stated in the introduction and dovetails with the discoveries that were made in
section 4.

The first task—interpreting the findings of the analysis. Address two important questions: 1]
“How do the findings of your analysis illuminate the rhetorical function or significance of the
artifact?” 2] “What do these findings tell us about the value of the artifact?” You are here
evaluating the artifact’s effectiveness and/or appropriateness of the artifact. As noted above,
these conclusions will guide the development of the thesis.

The second task—presenting the rhetorical implications of the analysis. Consider two
questions: 1] “What might this analysis tell us about the nature and/or functions of other similar
rhetorical artifacts?” and 2] “How might this analysis contribute to rhetorical theory in general?”
These generalizations are based on what was found in section 4. This closing section is
typically brief but is useful for providing a context for your analysis within the field of rhetorical
studies.

Formatting:
You are expected to write 3 FULL pages minimum using a standard TNR 12 font, standard
margins, and double spacing. Papers that are 2 1/2 or 2 3/4 pages or that are short because
of stretched font or margins will NOT receive a passing grade.

Any outside source consulted, paraphrased, or quoted should be properly cited and included in
a works cited page

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more