Expert Answer:3-1 Final Project Milestone One: Draft of Backgrou

Answer & Explanation:InstructionsThis milestone will allow you to complete the Background portion of your final project. Use the case you identified in Module One to complete this assignment. In this milestone, create a draft that addresses the following:Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)?Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline of your case should include:The legal issuesThe judicial proceedingsThe procedural historyThe holding(s)Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court’s verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case? Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not?Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.To complete this assignment, review the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.
cj_560_milestone_one_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CJ 560 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: This milestone will allow you to complete the Background portion of your final project. In Module One, you chose a controversial court case in which
the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny, and that aligns with your educational and
professional interests in criminal justice. In this milestone, you will discuss the facts, the legal issues, the judicial proceedings, the procedural history, and the
holding(s) of the court case.
Prompt: Use the case you identified in Module One to complete this assignment. In this milestone, create a draft that addresses the Background portion of your
final project.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Background of the Case
A. Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was
involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)?
B. Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline
of your case should include:
1. The legal issues
2. The judicial proceedings
3. The procedural history
4. The holding(s)
C. Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court’s verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case?
Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.
D. Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as
well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not?
E. Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual
or potential) for your case.
F. Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual
or potential) for your case.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your draft of the Background portion of your final project will be submitted as a presentation and must include speaker notes or a
transcript. Audio and video are strongly encouraged because of the importance of communication in the criminal justice profession. Your presentation should
have 5–7 slides, although this is a minimum requirement; depending on the controversial court case you select, you may need more slides to comprehensively
analyze your court case. You should use current APA style guidelines for your citations and reference list, with a minimum of three sources.
Critical Elements
Background: Facts
Proficient (100%)
Provides clear, succinct, and accurate
summary of the key facts of the case
Background: Timeline
Develops clear, accurate timeline that
summarizes the court’s decision,
including the legal issues, the judicial
proceedings, the procedural history,
and the holding(s)
Background: Verdict
Clearly and effectively defends, with
evidence, position on court’s verdict
Background: Type of
Court
Explains where (local, state, or federal
court) the case was tried, specifically
addressing whether or not the case was
tried in civil court as well as criminal
court
Background:
Similarities
Background:
Differences
Explains the similarities between the
procedures in the criminal trial that
occurred and the procedures in a civil
trial (whether actual or potential) for
case
Explains the differences between the
procedures in the criminal trial that
occurred and the procedures in a civil
trial (whether actual or potential) for
case
Needs Improvement (90%)
Provides a summary of the facts of the
case, but summary has gaps in clarity or
accuracy, is wordy, or includes
unnecessary information
Develops timeline that summarizes the
court’s decision, including the legal
issues, the judicial proceedings, the
procedural history, and the holding(s),
but timeline lacks clarity, accuracy, or
detail
Defends, with evidence, position on
court’s verdict, but with gaps in clarity,
effectiveness, or logic
Explains where (local, state, or federal
court) the case was tried, specifically
addressing whether or not the case was
tried in civil court as well as criminal
court, but explanation is cursory or
inaccurate
Explains the similarities between the
procedures in the criminal trial that
occurred and the procedures in a civil
trial (whether actual or potential) for
case, but with gaps in detail
Explains the differences between the
procedures in the criminal trial that
occurred and the procedures in a civil
trial (whether actual or potential) for
case, but with gaps in detail
Not Evident (0%)
Does not provide a summary of the
facts of the case
Value
15
Does not develop timeline that
summarizes the court’s decision
15
Does not defend, with evidence,
position on court’s verdict
15
Does not explain where (local, state, or
federal court) the case was tried
15
Does not explain the similarities
between the procedures in the criminal
trial that occurred and the procedures
in a civil trial (whether actual or
potential) for case
Does not explain the differences
between the procedures in the criminal
trial that occurred and the procedures
in a civil trial (whether actual or
potential) for case
15
15
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors related
to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization
Submission has major errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main
ideas
Submission has critical errors related to
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
organization that prevent
understanding of ideas
Total
10
100%
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment